What's the difference between qynio and OpenRouter?
+
Both are unified APIs for routing requests across 700+ models with drop-in OpenAI SDK compatibility. The differences are operational: qynio bakes in span-level tracing, evaluations, PII redaction, prompt-injection guards, Full audit trails, and self-serve onchain settlement — features OpenRouter either gates behind enterprise plans (EU routing) or leaves to external tools (Langfuse, Helicone via Broadcast). qynio also charges 3% on credit top-ups against OpenRouter's 5.5%.
Is qynio a drop-in replacement for OpenRouter?
+
Yes. qynio exposes an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so any OpenRouter setup using the OpenAI SDK can swap base_url and API key without rewriting prompts, tool calls, or routing logic. The same 700+ model catalog is available — Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, and others through a single key.
How is qynio's pricing different from OpenRouter's 0% fee?
+
OpenRouter charges 5.5% on credit top-ups (around 5% on crypto top-ups). qynio works the same way and charges 3% on top-ups, about 45% lower, with no subscription, no minimums, and the same pass-through provider rates.
Does qynio offer onchain settlement? OpenRouter requires enterprise for EU routing.
+
Yes, and it's self-serve from your first call. OpenRouter routes requests through eu.openrouter.ai but limits that to enterprise customers by request. qynio runs the same Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Mistral models on USDG on Robinhood Chain, Azure EU, GCP EU, and Berget AI — pin a request to an EU region with no plan upgrade, No sub-processor chain at all included.
Can I migrate from OpenRouter to qynio without rewriting my code?
+
Most teams move in under an hour. Change two lines — base_url and api_key — and your existing OpenAI SDK calls route through qynio instead. Model identifiers map cleanly across the catalog (e.g. anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 works on both). Add fallbacks, EU pinning, or guardrails when you're ready; nothing else has to change up-front.